Duncan
B. Campbell’s Mons Graupius AD 83: Rome’s Battle
at the Edge of the World is a welcome addition to the exciting “Campaign” series
published by Osprey. It joins such noteworthy books as William
Shepherd’s Salamis 480 BC: The Naval Campaign that Saved
Greece, Si Sheppard’s Actium 31 BC: Downfall of Antony
and Cleopatra, Nic Fields’ Thermopylae 480 BC: Last
Stand of the 300, and Michael Thompson’s Granicus
334 BC: Alexander’s First Persian Victory. Seán Ó’Brógáin’s
illustrations complement well Campbell’s account of this
battle which, Tacitus writes, took place at the end of the world
and nature: in ipso terrarum ac naturae fine (Agricola, 33).
Although this battle was located in a vastly remote part of the
empire, it was the most important military achievement of Agricola,
the Roman governor in Britain, and a battle that allowed Agricola
to hand over to his successor a country that was safe and at peace
(tradiderat interim Agricola successori suo provinciam quietam
tutamque, ibid., 40).
Campbell’s
text covers the origins of the campaign, reviews what is known
about Agricola and his men and Calgacus and the Caledonians, and
supplies the reader with a chronological narrative of the Roman
governor’s first through sixth seasons (AD 77–82).
The author, who is a specialist in ancient Greek and Roman warfare,
concisely, yet with a good grasp for detail, takes the reader through
the battle and its aftermath and introduces some theories regarding
the possible site of this ancient battle.
However,
the text does have some problems, such as items that are lacking
from the text that would have improved the work. For example, it
would have been helpful to have included an index locorum along
with the general index. In addition, a more complete bibliography
is highly desirable. The bibliography for this slender volume may
be adequate for the nature of Osprey’s “Campaign” series
that has as its stated aim to give “accounts of history’s
greatest conflicts, detailing the command strategies, tactics and
battle experiences of the opening forces throughout the crucial
stages of each campaign” (this quotation is taken from promotional
material from the publisher). However, the bibliography does not
seem adequate for some of the statements made by the author. For
example, Campbell relies on the unpublished findings of Stan Wolfson
when discussing the poetic parallels between the work of Silius
Italicus and Tacitus’ Agricola and includes Wolfson’s
unpublished textual emendation of the Boresti passage from Agricola 38:
Wolfson emends the accepted in finis borestorum exercitum deducit to in
finis boreos totum exercitum deducit. Campbell also selects
Wolfson’s emendation on the Trucculensian harbor passage
(Agricola, 38) for praise (trucculensem portum tenuit should
read trux Thulensem portum tenuit). The uneasiness this
creates is not that the emendations from this notoriously problematic
text are not convincing; rather, the unpublished work of Wolfson
does not allow for a careful appraisal of Wolfson’s argument.
Another
bibliographical difficulty arises when Campbell partially refers
to a scholarly source and does not include it fully in the bibliography.
For example, in his argument against those who dispute the veracity
of Tacitus’ account of the battle or even that the battle
took place, Campbell refers to Martin Henig’s work, yet no
full citation is given; the only information supplied is the journal,
volume year, and publication date. Since the referenced work is
not extensive or detailed in length, Campbell could easily have
included the entire reference. Campbell could then have quoted
from Henig’s work so that the reader could consider the argument
in a greater context. Campbell does note that Henig, “subsequently
recanted his denial of Mons Grapius, conceding that there was ‘skirmish
in the hills’” (87), a denial that is contained in
a brief letter to the British Archaeology journal.
This
is a minor quibble with a text that can be considered a competent
and detailed introduction to the battle at Mons Graupius. The bibliographical
problems discussed above are insignificant in comparison to the
value of the work. I recommend this work to all who are interested
in the battle at Mons Grapius, the Roman conquest of Britain, or
the life of Agricola.