The Arab conquests of the
Middle East are among the epoch-making changes in human history.
The sources we have for understanding these tumultuous events are
hemmed in by many limitations. We cannot always, perhaps ever,
find answers to the questions we most want to ask, yet by treating
the evidence with respect, and working with it, we can come to
a fuller understanding of what was happening. (p.33)
Hugh Kennedy, The Great Arab Conquests (2007)
Under the banner of Islam, four years
after the death of the Prophet Muhammad, in 636, nomadic tribesman
brought two longstanding empires, in the form of the Byzantine and
Sasanian, to their knees. Islam, no longer a religion of cult, was
the religion of state and it was the capacity of this Islamic state—integrating Arabia’s fragmented
society—that made the conquests possible, giving birth to a
new civilization as another passed away.
Needless to say, the conquests remain
a source of lasting and continuous inspiration for a variety of different
reasons to a variety of different people. For instance, Efraim Karsh, Professor
and Head of Middle East and Mediterranean Studies at King’s
College London, author of Islamic
Imperialism: A History (2006) —in a learned treatment of the history
of Islam, it must be noted—boldly illuminates Islam’s
imperial tradition.
Yet, unlike many of the books published
on Islam today, The Expansion of the Early Islamic State is
a volume that would have been edited and released notwithstanding
the events of September 11, 2001—in
actual fact, only one of the 19 chapters is written post-9/11. Paraphrasing,
Chase F. Robinson, the author of the aforementioned chapter, history
has not been pressed into service to express a view about the present
(p.305). Be sure, not playing to this obsession only adds to the
authority of the volume and there can be no better authority to edit
such a volume than Fred M. Donner, Professor of Near Eastern History
at the University of Chicago.
Edited by Donner, The Expansion of
the Early Islamic State is the latest volume in The Formation
of the Classical Islamic World series to make available a selection
of published research that has defined the formative period of
Islamic history (AD 600-950).
The various volumes endeavour
to be, in the words of the General Editor, Lawrence I. Conrad, “well
rounded and representative syntheses useful not as the definitive
word on their subjects—if, in fact, one can speak
of such a thing in the present state of research—but
as introductions comprising well-considered points of departure for
more detailed inquiry.” (xii)
After briefly but brilliantly
sketching the expansion and the scholarly interpretation thereof
(xiii-xxxi), Donner presents his brief but brilliant bibliography
(xxxiii-xlii). Even at this early point you feel that you are about
to read something very special indeed.
Leone Caetani’s chapter
opens the proceedings with an authoritative introduction on the art
of war of the Arabs (pp.1-13). From the supposed reputation of Khalid
b. al-Walid to the supposed religious fervour of the Arab conquerors,
the pioneering Italian scholar (d. 1935) persuasively, albeit controversially, penned that it was finance and food—as opposed to faith and fanaticism—which motivated the movement, i.e. impoverishment
not Islam.
Taking Caetani’s “univocal”
(p.21) thesis and the relegation of religiosity to task, G.H. Bousquet,
the renowned scholar of Islamic Law—in the first of his two installments
to feature in our volume—provided
some critical and sociological remarks. While Bousquet confined
himself
“to formulating a pointer in the right direction” in
his first installment (pp.15-21), the second (pp.23-35) illustrated
his “positive reasons to believe that the religious factor
played a far from negligible role.” (p.21) To that end, both
are rich in historical analogy.
Arabs living in penury were
evidently susceptible to the promises of booty which the holy war
would enable them to get their hands on. Bringing both theses together,
Marius Canard, author of Chapter Five, talked of plunder or Paradise:
“The attraction of booty
was furthermore linked to the religious enthusiasm. Thus it could
be said that the jihad was a lottery in which every player
could be assured of winning: those who died had the guarantee of
Paradise, those who survived had their share of the booty.” (p.68)
While there remained a lack
of consensus pertaining to the religious aspect, economic factor,
and/or relative military weakness of the Byzantines and the Sasanians
undergirding the conquests, there remained a (quasi) consensus pertaining
to the imperial aspect. John J. Saunders, author of Chapter Four,
even compared the Arab nomad with the Mongol nomad as empire builder
(pp.37-61). No wonder, given that the early Islamic empire was, in
truth, a conquest state dependent on booty.
On a more theological footing,
Walter E. Kaegi, Byzantine specialist at the University of Chicago,
touched upon Christian eschatology (pp.113-123) and Bernard Lewis,
the British-American historian at Princeton University, discussed
Jewish apocalyptic literature (pp.131-161) while, on a more technical
footing, Albrecht Noth (d. 1999) and Robert Brunschvig (d. 1990)
covered the relationship in the Caliphate between central power and
the provinces (pp.177-188) and Ibn Abdelhakam (pp.189-228) respectively.
As difficult as these particular chapters are to read, for this reviewer
at least, the volume is without doubt enriched by such contributions.
Donner’s chapter is
as easy to read as the abovementioned are as hard, yet the editor’s
own, scholarly but simple, contribution proves a worthy inclusion.
In fact, it is a magisterial interpretation on centralized authority
in the conquests (pp.263-286). Similar praise can be directed at
Robinson, Professor of Islamic History at the University of Oxford,
with his cogent historiographical reassessment (pp.287-312).
If you want a swashbuckling-of-sort,
chronological history of the conquests—conquest
by conquest, I might add—with
maps and illustrations to boot, then Hugh Kennedy’s The
Great Arab Conquests is the one for you; not The Expansion of the Early Islamic
State. Yet the informed reader need not be put off by this.
Despite comprising an esteemed
group of historians, Orientalists—call them what you will, this
weighty tome is a light read for students of the history of the Orient.
In other words, the reader will now have at their disposal a convenient
volume of the major published research on the Islamic state that
will allow them to come to a fuller understanding of what was happening.