James Howard-Johnson is the world’s
foremost authority on the wars between the East Roman Empire and Sasanian Persia
that consumed both powers in the first third of the seventh century,
and that laid the groundwork for the unexpected and explosive rise
of Islam just after the end of those wars—an event that the
author, among others, takes as the real end of the antique world. This
extremely useful volume in Ashgate’s Variorum series on Historiographical and
Historical Studies collects eight of Howard-Johnson’s specialist
articles on aspects of this epic struggle plus one previously unpublished
study. Since a number of the articles were first published
in obscure journals or as chapters in limited-run archaeological
publications, their collection is a real service to the scholarly
community. While undergraduate students will find much of the
material opaque, the collection is highly recommended for scholars
working in the field.
The articles range from 1983 to the present
(that is, in the newly-published study noted above), but are arranged
according to the chronology of their subject matter, not their publication
date. Thus, the collection gains coherence as a sort of composite
picture of the era. An initial chapter on “The two great
powers in Late Antiquity: a comparison”
leads to a final two studies of “Heraclius’ Persian campaigns
and the revival of the Eastern Roman Empire, 622-630” and “Pride
and fall: Khusro II and his regime, 626-628.” The latter
two also illustrate that Howard-Johnson’s perspective on the
great conflict encompasses both Roman and Persian perspectives, as
well as views from the Armenian middle ground between the great powers.
The studies fall into two types. First,
including the three aforementioned articles, are straightforwardly
historical: close studies of particular aspects of the extended war. In
these, Howard-Johnson’s judgments are always cautious and well-grounded,
but have the sure touch that makes them convincing and, in aggregate,
add up to an authoritative picture of the Roman-Sasanian conflict. Articles
IV, V and VI are the second type: extended critiques of key sources
from the period. Here too, Howard-Johnson’s breadth of
perspective and linguistic expertise shows. The official history
of Heraclius’ Persian campaigns (discovered and extracted from
unnoticed citations in later historians), two Armenian historians
(Sebeos and Movses Dashkurantsi),
and Al-Tabari all come in for careful analysis
that in the end reveals that we have more, and more reliable, evidence
for early seventh century history than is commonly assumed. It
is in these historiographical studies that, with the benefit of hindsight,
we can see Howard-Johnson working towards his monumental and essential Witnesses
to a World Crisis. Historians and Histories of the Middle East in
the Seventh Century (Oxford University Press, 2010), which convincingly
rehabilitates almost all the main Arab historians and historical
traditions concerning the rise of Islam through careful comparison
of them with all the known non-Islamic sources of the period, whose
reliability is much easier to establish independently.
Thus, between this collection of studies
and the later book for which this collection is both frame and preview,
Howard-Johnson has, in effect, written a history of the Middle East
in the seventh century that any future studies of the time and region
will have to take account of.