Professor Thomas Madden oversees another admirable contribution
to the study of the crusades, and specifically the 4th crusade, in this
compilation of papers from the sixth conference of the society for the
study of the crusades and the Latin east held in Istanbul in August of
2004. With numerous papers to choose from, Professor Madden assembled
a thematic cross-section of the most recent research into this perennially
fascinating topic. He arranges the book into three broad sections
entitled "Event", "Aftermath", and
"Perceptions" in order to reflect current trends in the historiography
of this seminal event
The first section of the
book is devoted to three articles discussing various aspects of the event
itself. Vincent Ryan's article, “Richard I and the Early Evolution
of the Fourth Crusade”, discusses the role of Richard I and Innocent
III in the shaping of what would become the 4th Crusade. Ryan reveals some
significant intersections among the various political figures, including
Innocent's roundabout attempt at shaming of Richard I and Philip Augustus
into ending their battlefield confrontations with each other in France
and taking the cross anew to finish the job in Outremer.
Other parts of this study, however, concentrate solely on Innocent's political
efforts. This shift belies the title and diffuses the focus of the
article somewhat. Also, the scholarly reader might appreciate a few
more references to supporting documentation underlying the argument. Still,
this study has several insightful observations on the short period between
crusades, e.g., the description of how Richard's absence continued to direct
events related to the Fourth Crusade after his death is interesting and
thought-provoking.
Pierre Racine's article provides
a useful economic description of the Venetian Republic and its hinterlands
around the time of the Fourth Crusade. He describes the efforts of
the Italian city states to increase their territories, focusing on the
Venetian expansion that began in the tenth century. Also mentioned
are the commercial materials that made Venice wealthy: lumber, textiles,
precious metals along with highly-prized spices and dyes. Many of
these commodities came from the Levant where trading privileges with the
Byzantine Empire and Muslim lands were crucial for Venetian success. The
back country of Venice was vital as well, though, to absorb and/or hold
the goods, according to Racine, and one gets a sense of the republic’s
delicate balance, especially given competition from Pisa and Genoa (and
others). Supposedly, trading ties with Byzantine markets and the
resulting stream of goods to Venice added up to a compelling interest against
diverting the crusade to Constantinople, thus challenging any suspicions
of a Venetian hidden agenda. The connecting argument for causation—or
lack of causation— is neither as clear nor as persuasive as one might
want, especially given the difficult relations Racine admits existed between
Constantinople and Venice. The strengths of this study lie rather in the
detailed portrayal of the Venetian Republic’s commercial equilibrium
in the late twelfth and early thirteenth century.
The last article in this
first section is Marco Meschini's examination
of the "Four Crusades" of 1204. Meschini considers
four separate military expeditions that he thematically unifies through
their shared use of the crusading vow. His unique and novel approach
to reconstructing the crusade from disparate viewpoints creates a very
interesting synergy among the various motivations of crusaders. His
article also bolsters the case for the importance of the vow itself to
the definition and prosecution of a crusade. Eventually, Meschini portrays the pope as a mediating figure among the
crusaders and their myriad competing interests. Innocent is portrayed
as an earnest leader who was overcome by the events of the crusade, and
who thus unwittingly contributed to its disastrous outcome.
The second section of the
book offers three articles examining the aftermath of the crusade from
the perspective of the crusaders, the Greeks, and in light of changes to
European coinage. Thomas Madden's article on "The Latin Empire
of Constantinople's Fractured Foundation" examines the complex political
relationships among the conquerors of Constantinople, and focuses his attention
on the competition between Boniface of Montferrat and Baldwin of Flanders
for the position of emperor. Professor Madden does a very good job
contextualizing the political positions of the two men and in giving the
conflict between them an important grounding in contemporary politics,
but his greatest contribution in the article is his calling into question
to oft-assumed honesty and clarity of Geoffrey de Villehardouin,
the primary chronicler of the 4th Crusade. By challenging Geoffrey's
perceived lack of bias, Professor Madden succeeds in presenting a more
nuanced account of the political divisions among the victorious crusaders.
David Jacoby offers a useful
overview of the lives of Greeks living under the Latin emperors. His
demographic approach, though limited by a lack of trustworthy quantitative
data, helps to reconstruct the population of Constantinople in the wake
of the 4th Crusade. Professor Jacoby lays out very interesting evidence
for which social groups stayed in the city, and which left, but he could
have done more with the materials by developing a workable model on notions
of loyalty and identity. Some treatment of whether Greeks who served
Latin emperors were seen as betrayers of their ethno-linguistic group would
have been interesting, especially in relation to the rule of Henry of Hainault. Overall,
however, Professor Jacoby succeeds in shedding necessary light on an important
aspect of the conquest.
Robert Leonard Jr. demonstrates
with admirable clarity the destructive consequences of the 4th Crusade
on the integrity of the Byzantine coinage. As he lays out in the
first sentence, "The Fourth Crusade triggered a permanent change in
the gold coinage of Europe." (Leonard, 75) Mr. Leonard points out
that Byzantium had been continuously minting gold coins, but after 1204
this came to an end, and within a century gold coinage was minted in Italian
city-states. In general the article provides a wonderful narrative
of the decline in purity in the Byzantine coinage after 1204, but a greater
emphasis on wider implications would have helped to contextualize the study.
The final section contains
articles examining the perceptions of contemporaries of the 4th Crusade. David
Perry’s article on the Translatio Symonensis delves
into an interesting discussion on the nature of Venetian piety and pragmatism
when faced with the opportunity to win spoils from Constantinople. In
recounting the theft (or divinely-inspired reacquisition) of the relics
of St. Simon the Prophet by seven Venetian crusaders, Perry introduces
important evidence, sparse though it is, about the thieves themselves and
he places most of them in the strata of the mercantile elite of Venice. He
then contextualizes their theft of the relics as “an audacious act
of devotion.” (Perry, 96) His reconstruction and analysis of this
event, while fascinating, could have been made more compelling by a discussion
of the interplay between their social backgrounds and potential motivations,
perhaps by drawing connections to their perceived need to demonstrate their
faith through dangerous and risky displays. The article ends with
a extremely helpful translation of the Translatio Symonensis.
Serban Marin’s
brief article on Venetian chronicles and their views of the 4th crusade
is an admirable effort to re-engender support for their value. He
addresses the two main concerns that historians have with these chronicles,
namely that they are derivative and propagandistic, by arguing that propaganda
can valuable in and of itself, and that they were not always simply propaganda. While
he sometimes advances these arguments at cross-purposes, the article is
still a call to mine every source as fully as possible.
Giulio Cipollone offers
a fascinating study that sheds fresh light on some of the “positive”
implications of the failure of the crusade, as opposed
to emphasizing the detrimental consequences of the sack of Constantinople. Through
the analysis of nearly 40,000 papal registers covering Gregory VII-Bonafice VIII, Cipollone posits that the evil deeds committed by the crusaders
during the unwarranted sacks of Zara and Constantinople inadvertently created
a nuova cultura (new
culture) of tolerance between the leadership of the Roman Church and those
who had previously been treated as dangerous threats to Christendom: Greeks,
Saracens, Jews, and other non-Christians. One symptom of this cambio culturale (cultural
change) in the papal curia was an emerging ethos of self –criticism
aimed particularly at the shortcomings of and evil deeds committed by fellow
Latin Christians. Indeed, the Roman Church became increasingly self-critical
during the course of the thirteenth century. For Cipollone,
the language of diplomatic letters and papal decrees calls attention to
an emerging pattern in which the papal curia began to define/describe their
fellow co-religionists in decidedly more negative terms, finally concluding
that some Latin Christians, the Venetians and Sicilians in particular,
were “peggiori degli altri” (worse than the others). Pope Innocent III
even condoned the Greek description of the crusaders as “da aborrire piu dei cani” (to
be abhorred more than dogs; Cipollone, 138).
This realization on the part of the papal curia resulted in a cultural
change which manifested itself in the observation that those “outsiders” were
in many ways more trustworthy and friendly to the interests of the Roman
Church than those who claimed to be loyal servants of the papacy. Therefore
an unexpected consequence of the Fourth Crusade was the diminishing reputation
of certain groups within Latin Christendom as a result of the evil deeds
committed while on crusade, and the improved standing in the eyes of the
papal curia of those who had previously been considered dangerous outsiders.
Cyril Aslanov’s exploration into the making of the first
prose chronicles in French will delight historians, linguists, and textual
specialists. Writing about their firsthand experiences as knights
participating in the Fourth Crusade, Geoffrey de Villehardouin and
Robert de Clari produced chronicles that have
become important sources of contemporary information, as most historians
of this period are aware. Aslanov, however,
is not so much interested in what these chivalric authors say as in the
import of how they say it. Style, point-of-view, wording, and, above
all, choice of language by these writers mark a significant departure from
chronicles of the past in which Latin prose or rhyming French were the
standards. This novelty of approach—Aslanov argues—arises predominantly from Byzantine
influence on the two French chroniclers during their time abroad. Using
in-depth textual analysis, Aslanov presents several examples of this effect such as
the frequent use of certain words in clauses (e.g., “sachiez que” and “quant”)
or the adoption of particular titles for figures in the chronicles. Taken
together, these stylistic tags do seem to illustrate a Byzantine manner
in the works by de Clari and de Villehardouin. Moreover, Aslanov suggests
an underlying cultural link between East and West via language (Greek,
Latin and French) that reveals itself, he says, in multi-language knowledge
among the people of Constantinople and identifiable word play in literary
works from the time, including chronicles, poetry, and early translations
of the Bible into French. His argument and use of linguistic evidence
may prompt scholars to look again at the depth of connections between Eastern
and Western Christendom in the Middle Ages.
William Hamblin rounds out
the collection of essays with a necessary corrective look at the crusade
from the perspective of the Arab chroniclers. Hamblin offers a fascinating
look at the role Constantinople played in Muslim thought, and he tries
to contextualize the fall of Constantinople in 1204 into the wider current
of Muslim concepts of the Apocalypse. He devotes a large section
to considering the famous Muslim historian Ibn Al-Athīr,
and his treatment of the 4th crusade, but Hamblin could have
done more to discuss Al-Athīr himself as
a way to humanize him as an author. The article contextualizes the
conquest of Constantinople from the perspective of those who would eventually
come to conquer it.
Overall this collection of essays adds measurably to
our understanding of the 4th crusade, and it does so in a variety
of fields and from a variety of perspectives. Professor Madden is
to be commended for assembling a diverse group of scholars who present
a cross-section of interests. Even readers whose interests do not
lay directly in crusader studies will find this book valuable and enlightening.