In recent years there has been growing interest among Greek
scholars about their country’s past under the Latin and Ottoman dominance.
One representative of this tendency is the book by Fôteine B. Perra,
whose Greek title can be translated as The Lion against the Half-moon:
The First Venetian-Ottoman war and the conquest of the Greek area (1463-1479).
The book is largely based on Perra’s PhD dissertation, which was accepted
at the University of the Aegean in October 2007. Although several
scholars have dealt whit this war, the book by Perra is the first monograph
that has the war as its main subject. The book concentrates on events in
Greek area.
The sources about the First Venetian-Ottoman war can be divided
into the Greek, “Latin”, and Turkish ones. The Greek sources
include the “historians of the Fall of Byzantium”, such as Doukas
and Kritoboulos, who continue their descriptions into the period after the
conquest of Constantinople in 1453. Also the so-called “Byzantine
Short Chronicles” offer sometimes valuable information. There are
a number of different types of “Latin” sources (i.e. from the
West-European cultural sphere, not necessarily in Latin). Largely these
are included in the collection Documents inédits relatives à l’histoire
de la Grèce au moyen âge by K. Sathas (8 volumes, Paris,
1880-1886), but Perra herself has also visited the archives of Venice and
used unedited material. New editions of some deliberations of the Venetian Maggior
Consiglio are included in the book. Further, the history of Hospitallers
by G. Bosio (Rome, 1625) gives some information and Perra has translated
the relevant parts of this source into Modern Greek in her book. The Turkish
sources give mostly sporadic information about the war with Venetians -
apparently this conflict was not so important for them - and it is possible
to say that Perra treats the war mostly from the Venetian perspective.
In the beginning of the book is a short overview chapter on
all seven wars that Venice and the Ottomans officially waged between 1463
and 1718. The “First Venetian-Ottoman war” was not, however,
the first time when the Venetians and Ottomans clashed together with arms;
this is noted in the next chapter, which deals with the relations of Venice
and the Ottomans from the beginning of the 14th century until
the outbreak of the war. But the Venetians were interested mostly in sea-trade,
and the Ottoman Empire was land-based. The
conquest of Constantinople is seen as a significant breaking point in the
history of the region. After that the Ottoman sultan Mehmed II (1444-1446
and 1451-1481) began the systematic conquest and annexation of the remaining
Christian areas in the surroundings of his empire. Perra claims that merchant
republic Venice tried to avoid wars until there was no other alternative.
Ottomans on the other hand were more warlike, because of the concept of
Muslim holy war and, as a more essential factor, the need to support the
army through conquests. When the Ottomans launched attacks against the Venetian
possessions in mainland Greece in 1462-3, the Venetians had to declare war
on 28 July 1463.
Perra divides the war into two phases, 1463-9 and 1471-9. Between
these phases is probably the most important and dramatic event of the war,
the Ottoman conquest of Chalcis (usually called Negroponte in this era)
in the island of Euboea. In her description of the military actions Perra
concentrates on the first phase of the war and on the conquest of Chalcis.
The description of the second phase is only very short, because major campaigns
were rare and the main events took place outside Greece.
There are separate chapters for diplomacy and for the impact
of war on Greek populations. The diplomacy chapter concentrates on Venice’s
efforts to find herself allies, both in the West and in the East where they
had dealings with the Turcoman Aqquyunlu-confederation. Perra claims that
the Ottomans did not need any allies. The chapter also describes the peace
negotiations between the Ottomans and Venice. Venice lost some areas and
promised to pay repetitions and tribute. The chapter about the impact of
war on Greek populations focuses on the significant population movements
in Greece that the war caused, and it emphasizes the importance of the support
of the local population for the Venetians especially in the Peloponnese.
Perra claims that thanks to this support and to fortunate events, the Venetians
could manage the situation during the first phase of war at least as well
as they did.
The main problems of the book are in its structure and focus.
The overview of all seven official wars between the Venetians and Ottomans
might be nice for a Greek-speaking non-specialist reader, but has little
interest from a scholarly point of view. Above all, its place at the beginning
of the book is problematic. The reader must jump from the last Venetian-Ottoman
war in the 18th century to the first contacts between Ottomans
and Venetians in the 14th century, and to a time preceding all
those wars that were just dealt with. If the writer (or publisher) truly
wanted to have this overview chapter, it would have been better to place
it at the end of the book as some kind of epilogue and leave the first war
out of it. Also the focus on Greece and Greeks when dealing with the military
events and impact on populations is problematic, especially when in the
chapter dealing with diplomacy the geographical scope is wide. For example
the events on the Albanian front and even the Albanian population of Greece,
which was quite significant at that time, are left out. It might also have
been useful to deal with military and diplomatic actions together.
Although the subject of the book is war, there is little analysis
of the methods of war, weaponry, organization of armed forces or comparable
subjects belonging to the field of military history. In other respects,
too, the writer could have been bolder with analysis and new conclusions
of her own. She has also chosen to write the book in her native language,
although evidently she is skilled enough to have done so in English. It
is good that research is published in smaller languages as well, and the
students of Byzantine history, for example, should be able to read Modern
Greek – but a similar requirement cannot be placed on international
students of Venetian and Ottoman history, who probably have an interest
in the subject of this book. Now they must depend on reviews like present
one, or hope for translations or new books on the subject in more accessible
languages.
[ED. NOTE: the author has also publised a different review
of the same work in The Bulletin of the Finnish School at Athens]