In 1494 Charles VIII of France led an army over the
Alps to attack the ruler of Naples in pursuit of
a number of rather hazily defined objectives. The march southwards was
largely a triumphal procession that left political chaos and instability
in its wake; the very scale of Charles’ success triggered reactions
across Italy and beyond. The scene was set for repeated conflicts that
saw France at war for most of the next sixty-five years.
David Potter’s substantial and densely documented
study sets out to examine the impact of these years of warfare on the
French military establishment and on French society more generally. In
general, the tale he tells is not particularly surprising. Heavy cavalry
remained at the core of French armies socially as well as militarily,
though increasingly supplemented by light mounted units. Infantry grew
in importance. Artillery became increasingly crucial on the field of battle
but remained even more central to siege warfare, where its growing hitting
power forced a massive—if somewhat piecemeal—programme of
rebuilding fortifications from the English Channel to the Pyrenees and
the Mediterranean. The armies were supported by a relatively professional
and competent bureaucracy, which might be able to undertake fairly realistic strategic
and tactical planning but was unable to prevent growing arrears of pay
and supply problems developing as the wars dragged on. Military discipline
could be shaky but tended to improve over time. The publication of royal
propaganda justifying conflicts and glorifying successes tended to become
more sophisticated (though the overtly racist and anti-Semitic tone of
some anti-Spanish propaganda comes as a surprise) and draw on new media
like the commemorative medal, and appears to have found a degree of assent
from a wider literate public amongst whom Erasmian pacifism
had only a limited appeal. When peace came (provisionally at least) in
1559, however, it was a peace of exhaustion.
Overall Potter paints a broadly convincing picture.
In some places he challenges conventional wisdom, seeking, for instance,
to rescue the French infantry from the condescension of contemporaries
and posterity alike by noting the development of what came to labeled the “old bands”.
These undeniably effective units, however, appear to have come into existence
almost un-noticed , growing out of volunteer
units raised by individual nobles, especially in Gascony and Picardy.
Centrally planned attempts to create a regular infantry force, whether
the francs archers inherited from the fifteenth century or François
I’s legions, were flops. Even with the “old
bands”, however, the French army remained heavily reliant on Swiss
and German mercenaries for its infantry (as indeed it did on Italians
for military engineering), despite their defects. They were difficult
to command, reluctant to do manual work during siege operations and inclined
to threaten strike action if not paid—to the extent that their pay
demands might impose unwise operational decisions on French commanders.
Nevertheless they were still the best troops around and could be paid
off at the end of the campaign season in a way Frenchmen could not easily
be.
The major shortcoming in Potter’s study is a certain
disregard for the operational aspects of warfare. While not entirely “military
history without the battles”, this tends to be campaigning viewed
from the paymaster’s tent, if not from the offices of the royal
administration. As a result, there is little analysis and explanation
of why, for instance, the battlefield performance of the French armies
in the 1520s was so dire and why they appear to have made a better fist
of things in the grinding siege-dominated warfare of attrition in the
succeeding decades. While he has a good deal to say about the development
of fortifications, there is very little concrete examination of actual
sieges, either those laid by French forces or those sustained by French
garrisons. Despite making use of the Memoirs of Blaise de Monluc, this is a rather
muted and even bloodless account of distinctly colourful and bloody times.
When Potter does identify operational issues his judgements
are sometimes debatable. The two factors that he identifies as altering
the battlefields of the early sixteenth century are the use of field artillery
and field fortifications. Clearly there were vastly more firearms of all
sizes on the field of battle in the 1520s than there had been in the 1420s.
On the other hand, field fortifications used in conjunction with such
weaponry (in the shape of the Hussite wagenburg and
its imitators further west) were already reshaping battlefield tactics
at the earlier date. The difference is arguably one of scale rather than
substance. Indeed Potter’s world, when viewed with eyes accustomed
to the French armies of the fifteenth century, displays a lot of familiar
features: a heavy reliance on mercenaries, with Swiss replacing the Scots;
a tendency to manage the heavy cavalry compagnies d’ordonnance as much as a source of royal patronage
as for military effectiveness; and problems over fraudulent musters and
embezzlement of royal funds. Certainly the problems of the 1520s look
very like those of a hundred years before: repeated defeats, collapse
of discipline and the emergence of quasi-military brigandage on the model
of the “Ecorcheurs”. Potter argues that discipline at least
had greatly improved by the 1540s but, beyond reference to normative sources
like Coligny’s code of discipline, does not explain how this had
been achieved.
Potter is rather inclined to understate his conclusions.
The reader is left to infer the impact of demands for taxation and supplies
for the royal armies upon French society as a whole, as well as the longer-term
consequences of the debts incurred to fight the wars for developments
in the 1560s. The structure of the book also sometimes blurs his arguments.
Important changes to pay and supply structures which tended to break up
the fifteenth-century
“lance” organisation of the compagnies d’ordonnance based
on a distinction between men-at-arms and archers in favour of one in which
all members were similarly equipped heavy cavalry are split up over three
chapters. It is similarly hard to get an overview of royal “news
management”
and written propaganda, with relevant material scattered
over several chapters. Despite its very wide range, some issues are left
out: naval warfare is ignored, and even on land there is very little on
French activities in Italy beyond Piedmont after the 1540s (Blaise de Monluc would not have
appreciated the virtual omission of the epic siege of Siena), and even
less on the French intervention in Scotland, even though both theatres
weighed heavily on the royal finances. The “culture” of the
title is largely confined to that of a tiny elite, though it is intriguing
to find just how limited the visual depictions of warfare are by comparison
with the sensational status enjoyed by Clément Jannequin’s onomatopoeic
show-off piece to celebrate victory at Marignano,
which had an even wider international career as the base for liturgical
music than Potter suggests (it was still used to that end in mid-seventeenth-century
Mexico).
Despite these quibbles this is a substantial and important
study which will require careful attention from all those interested in
Renaissance warfare.