As mentioned in the précis, Susan Rose’s main goal for her
book is to isolate the story of Calais under English governance and to
trace its history, in both political and military narrative and economic
progression, from its capture by the English in 1347 during the early stages
of the Hundred Years War until its surrender to the French in 1558. To
this end, her endeavor has been a success. Attempting to debunk assertions
by earlier historians that Calais served little purpose for the English
during these two centuries of possession other than prestige while simultaneously
creating a tremendous financial burden for the English by its maintenance,
Rose argues that Calais played an important role both diplomatically and
economically for the English, even if its militarily strategic significance
can rightfully be questioned. Indeed, not only has she taken pains to illustrate
the financial contribution and advantages provided by locating the wool
Staple at Calais, but she has also demonstrated how Calais was pivotal
for English political intrigue, serving as a base for factional support,
particularly during the Wars of the Roses and the conflict between reformers
and Catholics under Henry VIII, Edward VI and Mary I.
Organized essentially chronologically into nine chapters with a short
introduction and conclusion, Calais follows the important narrative
of the city’s existence under English rule, focusing primarily on
the political and military timeline with a healthy sprinkling of economic
details. In addition, Rose has devoted two main chapters, and significant
portions of others, to the Calais wool Staple, discussing it in large part
by examining the lives of leading merchant families involved with the Staple,
such as the Celys and Pastons in the fifteenth century, and the Lisles and Johnsons in the sixteenth. In fact, the development
and role of the Staple in the everyday life, economy and political status
of Calais is a crucial theme running through the entire book, and at times
the reader wonders whether a close scrutiny of the Staple was actually
intended to be the primary focus of the work. The bulk of the text is devoted
to the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries; the chapter on the early Tudors,
by comparison, occasionally feels quite rushed and the reader is left feeling
that there is material that was omitted or glossed over.
Rose exhaustively mines information in certain documentary evidence, such
as the Lisle letters or Johnson papers, as well as documents contained
within archives such as the British Library and the National Archives in
London, to pinpoint issues particularly affecting the story of English
Calais. Additionally, she utilizes many primary source excerpts reproduced
in other works. The bibliography, while not staggeringly comprehensive,
contains a good balance of primary and secondary sources, including the
standard authoritative works, and illustrates the fact that Rose is capable
of working with multilingual sources; secondary sources in French are as
numerous as those in English.
Calais is written in lively prose and flows easily. A relatively
short book, at fewer than 200 pages, it makes for a quick and cohesive
read. There are few illustrations, the great majority of which pertain
to sixteenth-century Calais and thus are concentrated within the last third
of the book; however, the most useful image is the map at the beginning
of the book which shows the major cities, towns and castles of Calais and
the boundaries of the Pale based on a survey of 1536. During discussions
of the military movements in and around Calais during the Hundred Years
War, additional maps would have been helpful, particularly for those who
are better served by visual depictions of military strategies than by text
alone. Ultimately, however, Calais is not a book that attempts to
wow its audience with a splashy pictorial display, but rather with good
solid text. As a result, it is not a book geared towards those with a casual
interest in history, but rather those for whom a more specific investigation
into the minutiae of the city’s history and functions holds appeal.
That quotes in Middle French and Middle English are often included without
translation, which assumes the reader’s comfort with medieval languages,
as well as the frequent allusion to different medieval coinages without
explanation, additionally points towards a more specialized and scholarly
intended audience. And it is this audience that will find Calais to
be a useful source, one that presents a continuous, if sometimes perhaps
unevenly focused, narrative of Calais’ history under English governance.