Chapter XXX: How he avenged the murder of Charles, count of Flanders

I intend
to relate his finest exploit, the most noble deed he performed from his youth to
his life's end; although it ought to be expatiated on, I shall recount it
briefly, concentrating on what he did rather than how he did it, in order to
avoid boring my readers.
The famous and very powerful count Charles,
son of the king of Denmark and King Louis's aunt, succeeded by hereditary right
the brave count Baldwin, son of Robert of Jerusalem, and ruled the very populous
land of Flanders both vigorously and diligently, proving himself an illustrious
defender of God's church, a lavish almsgiver and a notable protector of justice.
Discharging the duty of his honour, he sought several times and legitimately to
bring to the judgement of his court certain powerful men of low birth who had
risen through their wealth, and who were arrogantly trying to extricate their
family from his lordship although they were of servile origin. They were the
provost of Bruges and his relations, notorious criminals puffed up with pride,
who trapped the count most cruelly.
One day Charles came to Bruges and went
early in the morning into God's church; he was kneeling on the floor in prayer,
holding a prayer book in his hands, when suddenly a certain Burchard, the
provost's nephew, a savage fellow, arrived with other members of that wickedest
of families and other accomplices in his detestable crime. As Charles was
praying and talking with God, Burchard quietly slipped behind him , unsheathed
his sword and gently touched the neck of the prostrate count, so that when the
count raised it a little he would make a better target for the unexpected sword,
then with one blow he impiously killed the pious man, and thus the serf
decapitated his lord.
His accomplices in this horrifying murder who were
standing around thirsting for his blood, like dogs feasting on abandoned
corpses, took pleasure in hacking the innocent man to pieces, particularly
rejoicing that they had been able to accomplish the evil deed they had conceived
and the wickedness to which they had given birth. As if blinded by their own
malice, they heaped iniquity, and massacred all the men of the castle and nobler
barons of the count they could find, either in the church or outside in the
castle, putting them to the sword in the most wretched way when they were
unprepared and unshriven.
The assassins buried the count in the
church itself, fearing that if he were brought out for mourning and burial, the
people who were devoted to him both for his glorious life and for him more
glorious death would be aroused to seek vengeance. Then they turned the church
into a brigands' cave, fortified both it and the count's house which was next to
it, procured whatever food they could and decided with the utmost arrogance to
protect themselves there and thus to take over the land.
The Flemish barons who had not consented to
this were shocked by so great and wicked a crime. They wept as they attended the
count's obsequies in order to avoid being branded as traitors, and reported it
to the lord king Louis, and indeed to everyone, for the news swept across the
world. Love of justice and affection for his cousin inspired war from the
English king or Count Thibaud. So he crossed courageously into Flanders, intent
on using all his resources to punish the wickedest of men most cruelly. He
established as count of Flanders William of Normandy, son of Duke Robert of
Jerusalem, who had a claim through ties of blood. Without fear either for the
barbarity of the land or for the loathsome family which had engaged in treason,
he went down to Bruges, and blockaded the traitors tightly in the church and the
tower, preventing them from obtaining any food other than what they had, which
by divine assistance now disgusted them because it was unfit for use. For a
while he wore them down by hunger, disease and the sword; then they abandoned
the church the church and kept only the tower, which also guarded them.
Now they despaired of life, and
their lyre was turned to mourning and their organ into the voice of them that
weep (Job XXX, 31); the most wicked Bourchard left with the agreement of
his companions, hoping to flee the land but found himself unable to do so,
though only his own iniquity prevented him. On his return to the castle of one
of his intimate friends he was seized by the king's command and suffered
exquisite torture in death. Tied to the upper part of a high wheel, exposed
naked to the rapacity of crows and other birds of prey, his eyes torn out and
his whole face lacerated, pierced by a thousand blows from arrows, lances and
spears, he perished miserably and his body was thrown into a sewer.
Bertold, the brains behind the plot, also
decided to flee; but when he found he was able to wander around without
restriction, he returned through sheer pride; for he asked himself, 'Who am I
and what have I done?' So he was captured by his own men, handed over to the
king's judgement and condemned to a well-merited and wretched death. They hanged
him from a gibbet with a dog and as the dog was struck it took its anger out on
Bertold, chewed his whole face and, horrible to relate, covered him with
excrement; so, more miserable than the most miserable of men, he ended his
wretched life in perpetual death.
The men the king had besieged in the tower
were forced by many hardships to surrender. In front of their relations Louis
had them thrown our one by one from the top of the tower to crush their skulls.
One of them called Isaac had been tonsured in a monastery to avoid death; Louis
ordered him to be defrocked and hanged on a gibbet. Thus victorious at Bruges,
the king rapidly led his army to Ypres, an excellent castle, to take vengeance
on William the Bastard, who had fomented the treason. He sent messengers to the
people of Bruges and brought them around to his side by threats and flattery.
Then as William barred his way with three hundred knights, half the royal army
rushed against him and the other half went off at an angle and boldly occupied
the castle by way of its other gate. The king kept it, William lost all claim to
Flanders, and was banished. Because he had aspired to gain Flanders through
treachery, it was right that he should gain nothing whatever in Flanders.

This translation © Jean Dunbabin, St. Anne's College, Oxford OX2 6HS, England, from whom all necessary permissions to reproduce must be sought.